The scientific dogma which still exists that our reality doesn’t require consciousness was shared by Einstein. He stated: ” Nature exists regardless of consciousness and material objects have their own properties”.
Is there any proof for this statement? Why is -according to what we know today- this statement wrong?
It is wrong because every perception always and without any exception is a creation of spirit. This is what we call experience.
Scientific statements are always interpretations and in no way is there any science of nature independent of consciousness.
As nothing exists without having been perceived, named or interpreted by a human consciousness and the information thereof only is multiplied by man, objectivity without consciousness is an illusion.
All perception – also of nature – is always a spiritual construct.
Reality can only be recognized through the window of our spirit. Therefore each and every existence in time and space is the work of spirit.
However, applying the quantum effects of “activation of reality by perception” to other forms of nature , then a possibility may exist that man is not the only one to activate reality. But we cannot prove that, because to prove it we would make use of human consciousness.
Matter, reality independent of consciousness therefore is a chimera.
“Matter is a reality only when it is perceived by a consciousness”
(George Berkeley, 1685-1753)
“Reality is created by observation”
(Niels Bohr, 1922 nobel prize of physics)